Skip to Content

If you have been impacted by the 2026 Victorian bushfires please contact us on 13 21 61 to discuss your circumstances.

State Revenue Office
Log in

Zarpat Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Review and Regulation) [2019] VCAT 306

Background

The issue was whether the taxpayer’s acquisition of a 25% interest in a unit trust constituted a ‘relevant acquisition’ within the meaning of s78 of the Duties Act 2000. This turned on whether the transaction had breached the terms of a trust deed and whether a resulting trust arose over the units so that no beneficial interest could be conveyed to the taxpayer.

Decision

On 4 March 2019, the tribunal decided the matter in favour of the Commissioner. Among other things, it held that irrespective of whether there was a breach of trust, a resulting trust could not have arisen in the circumstances. Among other things, there was no transfer to a trustee on a trust that either failed or was incomplete. The transfer was also purportedly made by way of a capital distribution. This was similar to a gift, which falls outside the scope of a presumed resulting trust.

Updated: 1 December 2025